Tuesday 13 June 2017

Nine of the World’s ten Least Peaceful Nations Were All Targeted by US Intervention





inserted below was Written by June 12, 2017; American
The fact that the media are NOT writing and exposing this issue, goes a long way to illustrate just how corrupt the media really is.  They spend hours a week excoriating Putin without a single shred of evidence, except for the word of the FBI and NSA.... but we all know how well that turned out in the WMD analysis for Iraq.  

The original article is as follows;  and can be found at this AntiMedia link or Zerohedge link.
 
(MPNThe annual Global Peace Index, recently released for June 2017, has found that while the world is more peaceful now than last year, violence has increased significantly overall in the past decade.

Although the situation has improved in many countries, the ten lowest-ranking nations – known as the world’s “least peaceful” countries – have shown little change in recent years.

However, nine of those ten countries share one commonality in the violence that they’ve experienced: U.S.-led destabilization efforts and regime change operations.

 

Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan: Targets for regime change and manufactured sectarianism

Syria, which ranked last in the June 2017 index, has been in the throes of a U.S.-led regime change effort for the better part of six years – a conflict that has ravaged one of the most prosperous nations in the Middle East and turned it into the latest battleground for a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia.

The U.S. has been planning the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad at least as far back as 2006. Since the 2011 “uprising,” the U.S. has continuously funded and armed opposition groups in Syria along with several extremist groups, many of which have since joined terrorist organizations like Daesh (ISIS) and the al-Nusra Front.

The nations that rank just above Syria – Iraq and Afghanistan – were both targets of major U.S. invasions in the early 2000s and the U.S.’ continued presence in both of these countries has greatly contributed to the still-deteriorating situations in both nations.
With the U.S. troop presence growing in Iraq and set to surge dramatically in Afghanistan with the deployment of over 50,000 troops, more conflict is inevitable.

South Sudan: “Nation-building” gone awry

South Sudan, which ranked fourth, has also been victimized by U.S. intervention and “nation-building.”

The U.S. pushed South Sudan to secede from Sudan in 201,1 as South Sudan held 75 percent of Sudan’s oil reserves — the largest oil reserves in all of Africa. Analysts argued that the U.S. sought to create an independent South Sudan in order to dislodge Chinese claims to Sudanese oil, as the Chinese had previously signed oil contracts with the (now Northern) Sudanese government. The U.S.’ significant aid contributions to South Sudan, totalling $1.6 billion between 2013 and 2016, suggest that Washington has sought to influence the government there for that very purpose.

Just two years later, however, South Sudan dissolved into a deadly civil war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced more than 1.5 million. Some analysts have suggested that the civil war broke out between South Sudanese President Salva Kiir Mayardit and his former deputy Riek Machar only when Mayardit started to cozy up to China.

The chaos from U.S. meddling in South Sudan has reached beyond its borders and brought trouble to Sudan, with that nation ranking as the eighth least peaceful nation.

Yemen: U.S.-backed Saudi aggressors responsible for famine, war crimes

Yemen, which ranked fifth, has also been involved in a U.S.-linked conflict, though the United States’ role has been less direct. While the U.S. is not leading the fight in Yemen, it has ardently backed the war’s aggressor – Saudi Arabia – from the beginning and has supplied the Saudis with billions of dollars in weapons, as well as occasionally bombed locations in Yemen to aid their Gulf allies.

In addition, the U.S. has turned a blind eye to the Saudis’ numerous war crimes in Yemen, despite the enormity of the tragedy unfolding there, including blocking aid shipments and consequently triggering widespread famine. The U.S. has been eager to see Saudi influence continue in Yemen – as it was prior to the conflict – due to Yemen’s location, which grants it control over the strategic strait of Bab al-Mandab, a chokepoint for the Saudi oil trade.

Yemen is followed by Somalia in the rankings.

Somalia: State of anarchy persists thanks to U.S. involvement

U.S. involvement in Somalia has a long history and reached a climax in the early 1990s, when the U.S.-supported military dictatorship of Siad Barre was overthrown, plunging the nation into civil war.

Thanks to Somalia’s strategic location for global oil markets at the mouth of the Red Sea, the U.S. became involved and, according to a staffer for the chief of the UN Somalia operation, “dragged the UN into Somalia kicking and screaming.” Somalia remained in a state of anarchy for 16 years until a coalition of Islamic courts took over the capital in 2006. However, this government was soon overthrown by Ethiopia with U.S. support.

Current U.S. anti-terrorism policy in Somalia, which includes the use of airstrikes, has been blamed for worsening the nation’s conflict and its burgeoning humanitarian crisis, having driven the nation into famine.

  Libya: Plunged into chaos after challenging U.S. petrodollar

Another recent victim of U.S. regime change efforts, Libya now ranks as the seventh least peaceful nation in the world. Once one of the most prosperous nations in Africa, former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi made the “mistake” of challenging the U.S. petrodollar system by creating a gold-backed pan-African currency known as the dinar. Following his ouster, Libya was essentially transformed into a failed state where there is still no clear government, terrorism runs rampant and slaves are now openly traded in public.

Ukraine: Targeted by U.S.-led coup over gas industry

Ukraine, which was the target of a U.S.-led coup in 2014 to weaken the influence of Russia’s lucrative gas industry on European gas markets, now ranks tenth among the least peaceful nations in the world. The only nation ranking near the bottom that has not experienced clear U.S. involvement is the Central African Republic, which ranks ninth.

The United States’ not-so-peaceful ranking

The United States itself also plummeted dramatically in this year’s Global Peace Index, now ranking 114 out of the 163 nations surveyed. This decrease was the greatest decline measured in any country this year.

Statisticians have blamed divisiveness that has made itself plain following the 2016 presidential election, as well as a continued rise in homicide rates.

The United States’ involvement in military conflicts abroad is not factored into its ranking, meaning that this placement is conservative at best. As indicated by the ten lowest-ranking nations, if this factor were taken into consideration, the U.S. could likely find itself at the bottom of the list for its role in spurring disastrous and deadly conflicts around the world under the guise of foreign policy.

By Whitney Webb 

==== End of article ====


IN CONCLUSION:


We are not being well informed by the media, they are the mouth piece of the Global Elitists, who have a plan archited by the PROGRESSIVES. Progressives are found in all Political Parties across the political divide....... they have infiltrated every walk of life over the last 50 years.  Any narratives that upset the powerbase of America's war-machine-economy OR news painting a negative narrative against any party that is being pushed as part of their agenda is quickly sanitised and silenced.

How many times have people been surprised by how quickly certain big news stories disappear from the headlines.... well, now you have a clue.

One has to ask who can we trust?  

  1. The main-stream media are shown to be biased, negative, fake, misleading and not fit for purpose any longer. 
  2. The Governments have lied to the populace so many times, it is now a shock when a politician is genuinely honest and candid, such as we have witnessed from Nigel Farage when he kicks the living daylights out of those EU MEP's in their parliament.
Before you answer that question.  We have just witnessed a classic "Cluster-FCYK" with the British 2017 General Election, where a newly appointed Prime Minister decided to call a snap election.

Have you been taken in by all the and anti-government, anti-Conervative, anti-Brexit media spin?  If not, you are one of a very small percentage.  Sadly, most of the populace believes what they hear, see and read from the main stream media these days because they have been brainwashed from school as to the who, what, where and when by the PROGRESSIVE agenda that has slowly and stealthily infiltrated our education system both at school / college and University level.    
 
If you are in any way confused by what is meant by PROGRESSIVISM or PROGRESSIVES, please take the time to read "TitanicBritain" by Joe Cater, which is an excellent 'BLUNT' eye opener for both sides of the political divide as to just how insidious and poisonous this movement is for each and every one of us.   Read and weep because of how we have all been fooled by this odious disease.

Everyone should broaden the sources of where they seek their information, take a look at web based new aggregators like zerohedge.com, from there you can build up a rich list of blogs and alternate new websites where you can gain access to enriched analysis and ALL facts, irrespective of what narrative they support. (LIKE the article above I have shared with you):

Happy blogging.




UK MEDIA - SHOULD STOP THIS HALF EMPTY GLASS NONSENSE

The General Election on June 8th 2017 had a few different surprises for many people, especially for Theresa May.  The way May and her advisors dealt with her cabinet colleagues in the days leading up to and during the election period was quite diabolical and a travesty in the making to say the least.

We all know that not only did Theresa May neglect to have collective input into the contents of the Conservative 2017 manifesto from her colleagues, she snubbed the Conservative Membership as well. It was like she did not trust anyone but herself, she held her cards close to her chest, barricaded herself behind her two advisors and shouted "tally-ho".

This was unlike Jeremy Corbyn's approach, which was collegiate, based on work, input and feedback from his team.

PERSISTENT NEGATIVE OUTLOOK FROM THE MEDIA:

Almost ALL of the mainstream Media is yet again only looking at the HALF-EMPTY glass and stirring up negativity, which is NOT only IRRESPONSIBLE, it is clearly traitorous and anti Great Britain. As I flick from channel to channel, it is quite apparent that the media cannot help itself, every broadcast is focusing on the negative, looking at how they can undermine the current government and party in power.

Why is it that most of the UK journalist are patently unable to look at the positives that came out of this fiasco, why is it they feel that only bitching, tearing down those who are trying to do what is right for this country is good journalism?

Yes, we know that many people thought, May could have avoided this fiasco by not being obtuse in the first place. As inferred by many, one doubts whether she could tell you how she thought she would win the animal lovers / pensioners / public sector workers, with her manifesto...... " Vote for us, we want to kill foxes, make old people freeze and not give public sector workers a pay rise.... oh and your kids won't get a hot lunch."

We all know the negative aspects, now we would like to hear about the POSITIVE aspects.

The Media should dig deep into those BIG brains of theirs' and start looking at the positives and begin fostering a positive media environment for Great Britain to prosper.

WHAT ARE THE POSITIVES:
  1. The irritation of SNP baying for a second Scottish Referendum to leave the Union has been put to bed, at least for this generation.
  2. The incorporation of the DUP in government, who are pro the Union, which helps to strengthen the Union.
  3. The stopping in it's tracks of a new middle ground "PROGESSIVE" Party promoted by Tony Blair and the Global elitists.
  4. A humbled Mrs May, which will make for a better job as a listening and empathetic Prime Minister.
  5. Mrs May has a strengthened mandate for carrying out a BREXIT because the DUP as well as many in the Labour Party voted and supported a 'hard Brexit'.
  6. The BREXIT team can now incorporate other cross Party influential players such as Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage as part of the BREXIT negotiating team.
  7. The odious Conservative manifesto has been dumped, which now allows the Conservative's to create a new manifesto that incorporates some of the more public friendly points mentioned in 1,000's of the different blog posts in the last 4 weeks.
  8. Labour lost the election, Conservatives won the election - politicians need to SUCK IT UP and move on with the business at hand.
  9. The Conservatives have got behind Mrs May as was illustrated in the 1922 Committee at their recent forum, so continued calling for her resignation if childish.
  10. May has been forced to relook at the security of this country in light of the recent terrorist attacks, which means that the reduction of Police force members can be reworked and as suggested by so many Britons over the last month, "It is time to look after Britain and Britons, so why nor consider halving Overseas Aid, and spend that cash on Social care, pension and police numbers".

CONSERVATIVES MUST START APPLYING REMEDIES TO LESSONS LEARNED:

If Theresa May plus members of her Cabinet, other elected Conservative Party members on the back bench and the Conservative Campaign office for that matter do NOT learn anything from this fiasco, they do NOT deserve to run a school fete, let alone this country.

Interestingly, as can be seen from the many 1,000's of blog posts in social media, many of the public believed that it did not occur to Theresa May to have any regrets about her actions by 22:00 on that fated night of the 8th June, because she and her advisors had been drinking their own cool-aid.

IN CONCLUSION:

We are a great country, full of great people with a wonderful culture. Yes we are a multi-cultural country, which does NOT mean that Britons should forfeit our great culture, that was why we voted for BREXIT. Britons want to protect our sovereignty, our culture and our jobs.

The Media should start focusing on the positives, and use their screen time or printed inches to start pressuring the Government to adopt many of the points raised in the manifesto's from the other Parties as a show of good faith to being truly a government for the people.

We now have a more positive base from which to spring, so hopefully, Mrs May will now adopt a more conciliatory and inclusive style of management with those surrounding her, because if she does not do this, she will surely be replaced as Prime Minister within her own Party.  Lessons should have been learnt from this election, which the Party must act on.  The Party also have to find a way to attract, embrace and enthuse the younger generations; for example it is grossly UNFAIR that England domiciled students have to pay for University, whereas those in Scotland do NOT have to.

Finally, everyone in the UK, irrespective of which side of the Political divide we sit, we ask that Europe stop their whining, the UK will step up when the team are ready.  Watch this space as Mr Juncker becomes even more vociferous to try intimidate us over the next few weeks.

Example on how the mainstream media is letting us all down:  What the Media is NOT telling us.




Saturday 10 June 2017

THE SILVER LINING IN WHAT JUST HAPPENED ON JUNE 8TH 2017

Yes, "the Conservative Party failed to win in Labour's heartlands and lost ground in the south as voters rejected Theresa May's appeal to give her a personal mandate to negotiate Brexit," says TheTimes. May herself has been "humiliated" by the result...... they gleefully stated.

The media would have you believe that May's ship is dead in the water and the people are protesting in the streets baying for her head on a platter.  Instead of tabling all the positives about how well Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May both did in their own right, in the interests of this country.

As could be expected from the insidious PROGRESSIVE machine (see link), they have stirred up those on the left to immediately begin protesting outside Parliament, echoing Jeremy Corbyn, whose Labour party finished with 262 seats; who called on Theresa May to resign, arguing that the "politics of austerity" had been rejected. She must "make way for a government that would be truly representative of the people of this country", he said.

Are those on the left being duped by the media, or is this typical of the left, do they have very little rational thinking when it comes to losing elections and accepting the outcome of a democratic election? Also, as was expected of the main-stream media, they are making a big deal of this as headlines and the constant echoing of Corbyn's call for May to resign on their TV channels, simply because of their bias against conservatism (notice the little 'c') and their ratings.

If you are in any way confused by what is meant by PROGRESSIVISM or PROGRESSIVES, please take the time to read "TitanicBritain" by Joe Cater, which is an excellent 'BLUNT' eye opener for both sides of the political divide as to just how insidious and poisonous this movement is for each and every one of us.  Progressives are found in all parties....... they have infiltrated every walk of life over the last 50 years.  Read and weep because of how we have all been fooled by this odious disease.

Sadly for those unemotional, rational, logical thinking people of this great country, the left are illustrating to the right that as per usual cannot accept democracy and are protesting in the streets again, which is what the media love because it boosts their readership.

That said, every citizen of the United Kingdom should take a leaf out of the TV series; Monty Python's Life of Brian, and "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life" the famous comedy song written by Monty Python member Eric Idle.

There is a SILVER LINING in what has just happened on June 8th 2017, whilst many feel that Theresa May's big gamble - to call a snap election, which she called three years before she had to - has backfired badly, or so the "Lame-Stream" media would have us believe. They say this because they want us to believe that stripping the Conservatives of their parliamentary majority and eroding away her personal authority and clout has damaged this country.  

Does this country need more elections, unrest, disruption and misinformation pedalled by the "Lame-Stream" media to further destroy our society and country?  What do you think?

However May has quite rightly for the sake of the country, chosen to hold onto her position as Prime Minister and has announced she will put together a government with the support of Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionists, (DUP). This will ensure the majority she requires to pull off the BREXIT negotiations and get the necessary Parliamentary sanction.

WHO ARE THE WINNERS AND LOSERS IN 2017

What the media are not telling the masses is that as Conservative, Theresa May has achieved the highest % of the votes for a generation beating - Cameron, Major and Thatcher.

The number of votes tells everyone just how well Theresa May actually did;
 
May obtained circa 13,667,213 votes, which was more than the 13,518,000 secured by Tony Blair in his famous 1997 landslide and 2,000,000 more than her predecessor David Cameron secured in his famous but ill fated 2015 GE triumph.

As mentioned in The Week, support for the Scottish National Party has crumbled, with the SNP losing a third of its seats, including those of former party leader Alex Salmond and current deputy leader Angus Robertson. 

Among the high-profile scalps taken by Labour in England was the former deputy PM and Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, who lost his Sheffield Hallam constituency.

In Northern Ireland, both the SDLP and UUP have been wiped out, losing all of their seats at Westminster. "The confirmed results saw the DUP win ten seats, Sinn Fein win seven and independent candidate Lady Sylvia Hermon retain her seat in North Down," the BBC reports.

Some might say, thankfully, Ukip leader Paul Nuttall failed in his bid for the constituency of Boston and Skegness, securing a mere 3,308 votes – well short of the Conservative Matt Warman's tally of 27,271. The Ukip party ends the night without an MP, and less than a sixth of the share of the vote it received two year ago. Nuttall has stepped down as leader, and analysts are pondering whether this is the end of the party.

GIVING PRAISE AND CREDIT WHERE IT IS DUE.

Both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn are in fact the heroes of this era.  Not only has May  achieved the highest % of the votes for a generation beating - Cameron, Major and Thatcher, Corbyn nearly annihilated the Tony Blair record as well with 12,874,985.

The calling of this snap election was in actual fact a blessing for the United Kingdom, as illustrated by the silver lining points below; it will also be seen in decades to come as a stroke of genius by Theresa May, as it consolidated several positions of concern, strengthened the union of the United Kingdom and removed the threat of Theresa May acting without a mandate as an elected Prime Minister.

SO WHY IS THIS GOOD FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM?


1. We now have the most pro-Brexit House of Commons ever elected. More than 90% of MP's have been returned for Parties that are promising to leave the EU, namely the Conservatives, Labour and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). This has given Article 50 an unarguable authority.

2. In the run up to before May called the 2017 election, she was lambasted by the left wing pundits in their attempts to undermine what she was doing, with the point that she was not a duly elected Prime Minister. May is no longer an unelected Prime Minister, she has her own mandate, she has been elected.

3. The union of the UK has strengthened because;
   a) the DUP success in NI has strengthened the Union. 

   b) thankfully, Ms Sturgeon and her calls for a 2nd Scottish Referendum has been neutered, 

   c) Nick Clegg, Alex Salmond and Angus Robertson lost their seats and were unceremoniously dropped from Parliament. This will help to further mitigate the noise and unnecessary disruption coming from that quarter.

4. The size of the majority in the House of Commons should have no impact on EU Brexit negotiations.... it will be down to the steel, grit and tenacity of the negotiating team that will win the day. They need a responsible, strong leader to preside over them, not a infighting, backstabbing body of people all scrambling for the throne.

5. The rise of Ruth Davidson in Scotland, politicians and people should note that Ms Davidson is an absolute credit to the Conservative Party and Scotland.

6. Dealing with the Islamic Terror Threat: As a result of the three recent terrorist attacks in London and the blame that was pointed towards May's 6 years as the Secretary of the Home Office.... social media shows that May certainly has a strong mandate to take HARD actions and TOUGH steps against terrorism in the UK; May, certainly now, has that mandate to focus on stopping terrorism in the UK:

   a) The DUP understand the fundamentals of the religious wars over the centuries, this will help May to get laws in place that will help stop and neuter terrorism.

   b) The public have been baying in social media for decisive action to be taken against those 3,500 known Jihadi's, such as rounding them up, fingerprinting, biometric scans, DNA capture / registration, deportation, confiscation of their passports and cancellation of the British citizenships and being branded a traitors of the UK. 

   c) Strengthening of the UK Borders, more resources, more physical checks and the prohibiting entrance to anyone on any Government terrorist watch-list, or those returning from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq or Saudi. 

   d) Amending the Human Rights Act to: 

    i. ensure that an individual's human rights are forfeited by any persons committing or inciting acts that grievously harm persons or inflict cruelty to persons or animals,

   ii. do not let the human rights issue prevent deportations or incarceration of these terrorists.

7. Both Ms Sturgeon and Ms May have been humbled, both of them believed they were infallible and began to get too big for their boots and were totally deluded, suffering illusions of grandeur because they were drinking their own cool-aid.

8. Whilst Jeremy Corbyn did not manage to win sufficient of a majority to become Prime Minister and install Labour into the halls of power .... he has however, done this country a great service, he slapped down Tony Blair's ambitions to create another middle of the road political party, which would be filled with insidious progressive ideas and their globalist elitist machinations.

9. This hopefully puts an end of Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and New Labour. Corbyn's triumph was the final nail in the coffin of New Labour. Blair and Mandelson were hoping that Corbyn would fail spectacularly allowing a PREGRESSIVE moderate Labour Party to rise from the ashes. This essentially, puts a block on any new middle ground party forming as the left wing of Labour has been strengthened, thanks to Jeremy Corbyn.

10. The Conservative should have learned a lot from this election and if they apply the learning's, they will be well placed to capture the middle ground in the future;

11. As suggested by the Islamic Council, MI5 should work with all the Muslim Mosques in the UK, which they feel should be monitored and rewarded for identifying and reporting people who are promoting extremism, radicalisation and hate crimes. 

12.   To be a party that cares for ALL the people, the Conservative Party MUST adopt MANY of the points mentioned in the Labour and LibDem manifesto's to offer hope for the younger generations as they are the future of this great country. (See manifesto comparison table below.) 

   a) This is the second general election where the internet has played the largest part in communications with the populace, something the Conservative Party failed to harness. (Yet again).

   b) Conservative Party should readily adopt and employ a social media strategy that enables people from all walks of life to engage with the Conservative party as Labour have done.

   c) The Conservatives desperately need a persuasive campaign solution that includes a broad dataset so that the younger generations who do not have the historical background can read up on non-political-biased informative data, on which to base their voting decision. EDUCATION / CONVERSATION / PARTICIPATION. 

   d)  If the Conservatives want to survive, they MUST build up alliances with the younger generations, if they fail to do this, the Party will VANISH into oblivion over the next decade. The younger generations are the future..... The Conservatives had better WAKE-UP or they will find they are irrelevant quite soon! 

   e)  Politics needs an Online Presence with a Symbiotic Communication Forum: The 2017 campaign disaster could have been avoided if Party Members had access to a LIVE feed-back loop between Grass-Roots members into the Party and Campaign HQ: Sadly, even with all the fantastic social-media technology, there was yet again absolutely NO feedback mechanism that was monitored and responded to iteratively between members of the parties.... instead the Conservative Party used their membership lists as a one-way conduit, spamming members for donations and reminding them to vote. 

   f) The Conservative Party campaign machine is sadly, somewhat wanting in the Internet and new age of social media in comparison to the Labour machine. If the Conservatives want to survive, this must be remedied as soon as possible so that a following of younger generation can be built up.


IN CONCLUSION:

Now if ever there was a time for everyone in the UK to pull and work together, that time is now.
Both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn should forget the petty politics, they should stand shoulder to shoulder and fight for the best deal possible from the EU.  This is NOT a time to DIVIDE and RULE.... this is a time to act as a United Kingdom, for the sake of the people, our children and their children.

We need grown up politics, not childish bickering and innuendo across the aisle. We are a United Kingdom and a proud nation, so let's act as such and show the world what the Bull Dog spirit is all about.

If Theresa May was smart, she would pay heed the many suggestions (above) made by millions and incorporate them and many of the Manifesto points highlighted into a People's Manifesto, re-launch this as the way forward for a UNITED country, for the people, for the United Kingdom.

We should all be reminded how we arrived at this place intime..... here is a reminder:

How we ended up having to have this BREXIT in the first case...

https://positics-constitution.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/just-how-did-uk-come-to-have-referendum.html

APPENDICES: 

Comparison of Manifestos and a strong recommendation for Prime Minister May!

You may not have been aware of this, but a lot of BREXIT supporters spent several hundred hours inside the political quagmire of blogs over the last month, where they learned about the points people were interested in. Below you will find comparisons of the manifestos, which were done by the BBC and the Daily Mail, which has been brought together and colour coded based on comments within the blogs about what people wanted and did not want to see in a manifesto.

Putting aside any political bias, the analysis was done on earmarking those items that had more popular hits versus those that received less popular hits.  Those items marked in GREEN were deemed suitable to see in an all-rounder manifesto, whereas those marked in RED were deemed unsuitable for an all-rounder manifesto.

There were obviously significant overlaps across the three main parties, so editing of the points or reshaping of their narrative were not undertaken.

If the Conservatives were serious about doing what is right for the people, they would seriously consider taking on ALL the points marked as GREEN and create a composite People Manifesto for this next 5 years.



Primary Pledges


Conservatives:
Main pledges
#    Deliver a smooth and orderly departure from the EU
#    Increase NHS budget in England by £8bn a year by 2022/23
#    An extra £4bn on schools in England by 2022
#    Restating commitment to bring net migration down to tens of thousands
#    Balance budget by 2025
#    Replacement of triple-lock pension pledge after 2020 with double lock
Labour:
Main pledges
#    Bring an end to austerity and invest heavily in public services
#    Negotiate a Brexit deal that "puts the economy and living standards first"
#    Nationalise a number of utilities including rail, post, water and the National Grid
#    Increase taxation on business and the highest paid
#    Invest in the British economy through a £250bn stimulus package
#    Abolish tuition fees for university students in England
Liberal Democrats:
Main pledges
#    Hold a referendum on the final Brexit deal, with the option to remain in the EU
#    Add 1p to income tax to fund the NHS and social care
#    Rule out coalitions with the Conservatives or Labour – but want to make the Liberal Democrats the official opposition
#    Increase spending on early years, schools and colleges in England
#    Reverse some benefits cuts
 Tax and the economy


Conservatives:
1)      Savings of £12billion more than Labour through cutting waste and bureaucracy.
2)      Reduce Government borrowing by £8 billion, leaving £4billion for tax cuts - still to be specified.
3)      Achieve a balanced budget by 2025
4)      Rule out increases to VAT
5)      Stick with current plans to raise personal tax allowances and cut corporation tax
6)      Review the business rates system
Labour:
1)      No increase in the basic or higher rates of income tax.
2)      No extension of VAT on a range of items.
3)      Targeted tax cuts for families and to support work.
4)      £21billion of savings through reducing waste and cutting 80,000 civil service jobs.
5)      Introduce a £250bn stimulus package over 10 years
6)      No increases in personal National Insurance or VAT
7)      Reintroduce a 50p tax rate and raise income tax for those who earn over £80,000
8)      Raise corporation tax rates to 26% by 2020/21
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Abolish the council tax and replace it with a local income tax and introduce a new 50p top rate of tax on incomes over £100,000.
2)      Money raised to be used for spending on priority areas.
3)      Child trust funds to be scrapped.
4)      Balance day-to-day spending while reducing national debt as a proportion of GDP
5)      Add 1p onto each rate of income tax and ring-fence the money for NHS and social care
6)      Borrow £100bn to invest in infrastructure, including housebuilding, broadband, schools, hospitals and transport
7)      Reverse some planned cuts to corporation tax, capital gains tax and inheritance tax
Crime


Conservatives:  
1)      5,000 more police officers each year and paperwork to be slashed.
2)      Early prison release schemes to be scrapped and 20,000 new prison places to be created.
3)      A tenfold increase in drug rehabilitation places.
Labour:  
1)      Neighbourhood policing teams for all communities.
2)      24,000 extra community support officers and 12,000 police officers freed up for frontline duties.
3)      All prisoners to be supervised on release.
4)      Legislation to introduce ID cards.
Liberal Democrats:  
1)      10,000 more police on the streets and an extra 20,000 community support officers.
2)      Non-violent criminals to do tough community work as an alternative to jail.
3)      Plans for ID cards to be scrapped.
Foreign and defence


Conservatives:
1)      Give strong support to international institutions including the UN, Nato, Commonwealth, G20, G7 and WTO
2)      Become a global champion for free trade, signing new trade deals around the world
3)      Continue to spend 0.7% of national income on international aid
4)      Meet the NATO target to spend at least 2% of national income on defence, with above inflation increases each year
Labour:
1)      Order a strategic defence and security review
2)      Commit to spending 2% of GDP on defence
3)      Continue to spend 0.7% on international aid
4)      Roll out a "Homes for Heroes" programme that will insulate the homes of veterans for free
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Commit to spending 2% of GDP on defence
2)      Maintain 0.7% GDP commitment for international aid
3)      Suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia
4)      Maintain a minimum nuclear deterrent
Health and Care


Conservatives:
1)      Patients' right to choose hospital or have 50 per cent of the cost of the operation paid by the taxpayer if they go private.
2)      Matrons' power to close dirty wards in crackdown on MRSA "superbug".
3)      £8bn increase to NHS England budget compared to current level by 2022/23
4)      Include value of family home in means test for people receiving social care at home
5)      Cost of care to be capped and people guaranteed to keep £100,000 of assets once care bill paid
6)      Allow deferral of care bills until after death to ensure no-one is forced to sell family home
Labour:
1)      NHS patients' right to choose any hospital offering operation at NHS prices.
2)      Waiting times to be cut to maximum of 18 weeks.
3)      Expansion of private sector provision within the NHS.
4)      Consultation on new hospital hygiene laws.
5)      Commit to more than £30bn in extra funding for the NHS in England over the next five years
6)      Reverse privatisation and return health services into public control
7)      Guarantee access to NHS treatment within 18 weeks and A&E within four hours
8)      Lay the foundations of a National Care service and put an extra £8bn into social care over the next five years
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Free long-term personal care for the elderly.
2)      Free eye and dental checks.
3)      Fewer NHS prescription charges.
4)      Reduce "hidden" waiting lists for diagnostic tests.
5)      Add 1p onto each rate of income tax and ring-fence the money for NHS and social care
6)      Ensuring mental health care waiting time standards match those in physical health care
7)      Ensure that there are more nurses on hospital wards and in the community
8)      Introduce a Welsh NHS whistle-blowing hotline
Education & Family


Conservatives:
1)      Heads and governors to be given power to expel unruly pupils.
2)      600,000 extra school places to enable more parents to get first choice school.
3)      University fees to be scrapped but interest charged on student loans.
4)      Increase the overall schools budget in England by £4bn by 2022
5)      No school will have its budget cut as a result of the new funding formula
6)      End the ban on new selective schools
7)      Introduce T-Levels
Labour:
1)      More city academies. All secondary schools to become independent specialist schools.
2)      Failing schools to be taken over by successful ones.
3)      Maintenance allowances for poorer students to stay in education after 16.
4)      Abolish university tuition fees and reintroduce maintenance grants
5)      30 hours of free childcare for two-year-olds in England
6)      End the public sector pay cap for teachers
7)      Restrict primary class sizes to 30 and introduce free school meals for primary school children
Liberal Democrats:
1)      University tuition and top-up fees to be abolished with maintenance grants for poorer students.
2)      21,000 more primary school teachers to be recruited to cut class sizes.
3)      Spend £7bn extra on education, increasing school budgets and the Pupil Premium
4)      Oppose grammar schools
5)      End the 1% cap on teachers' pay rises
6)      Reinstate maintenance grants for the poorest students
 Asylum and immigration


Conservatives:
1)      Withdrawal from the Geneva Convention on refugees with an annual quota for asylum seekers.
2)      A points system for immigrants with Parliament setting annual cap on numbers.
3)      A new border police force to be created.
4)      Reduce net migration to tens of thousands
5)      Double the Immigration Skills Charge on companies employing migrant workers
6)      Increase minimum earnings threshold for family visa sponsorship
7)      Toughen requirements for student visas and rules allowing them to stay and work
Labour:
1)      A points system for immigrants
2)       Only skilled workers allowed to settle long-term.
3)      Entrants to UK requiring visas to be fingerprinted.
4)      ID cards for visitors staying more than three months.
5)      More failed asylum seekers to be removed.
6)      Freedom of movement will end when Britain leaves the European Union
7)      Reinstate the Migrant Impact fund in areas where immigration has placed a strain on public services
8)      Take students out of immigration numbers
9)      Recruit 500 more border guards
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Asylum seekers to be allowed to work to end dependence on benefits.
2)      Responsibility for assessing asylum claims to be transferred to a dedicated agency.
3)      Support the principle of freedom of movement between the UK and EU
4)      Allow high-skilled immigration to support key sectors of the economy
5)      Remove students from official migration statistics
6)      Welcome 50,000 Syrian refugees over five years and re-establish the "Dubs" child refugee scheme
Housing


Conservatives:
1)      Build "fixed-term council houses", sold privately after 10-15 years with automatic Right to Buy for tenants
2)      Build one million homes by end of 2020 and 500,000 more by end of 2022
3)      Build 160,000 houses on government-owned land
4)      Implement the Homelessness Reduction Act to halve rough sleeping
Labour:
1)      Introduce controls on rent rises
2)      Suspend the right to buy policy
3)      Build at least 100,000 council and housing association homes a year
4)      Make available 4,000 additional homes for rough sleepers
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Set target to build 300,000 new homes a year
2)      Create 10 new garden cities in England
3)      Stop right to buy for housing association tenants
4)      Allow councils to charge 200% council tax on foreign-owned empty homes
Welfare and pensions


Conservatives:
1)      Replace pensions triple lock with guarantee that increases after 2020 will at least match inflation and average wages
2)      Means-test Winter Fuel Payments "focusing assistance on the least well-off pensioners"
3)      Keep other pensioner benefits, including free bus passes and TV licences
4)      Give more power to the Pensions Regulator to protect private pensions
Labour:
1)      Keep the pension triple lock and benefits for pensioners, such as the winter fuel allowance and free bus passes
2)      Review the benefit cap, universal credit and reinstate housing benefit for under 21s
3)      Increase employment and support allowance by £30 per week
4)      Increase carer's allowance by £11 a week
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Keep the triple lock on pensions and free bus passes
2)      Withdraw winter fuel payments for wealthy pensioners
3)      Reverse cuts to Universal Credit
4)      Uprate working age benefits in line with inflation
Future of the UK


Conservatives:
1)      No decision-making that has been devolved will be taken back to Westminster
2)      No Scottish independence referendum before the Brexit process has played out, after that only if there is public consent
3)      Move significant numbers of civil servants outside London and the south east
4)      Create a United Kingdom Shared Prosperity Fund
Labour:
1)      Establish a constitutional convention to examine and advise on reforming Britain's constitution
2)      Reduce the voting age to 16
3)      Oppose an independence referendum in Scotland
4)      Create a role of Minister of State for England
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Home rule for each nation within a federal United Kingdom
2)      Keep the Barnett formula for Scotland and Wales but seek to increase the Welsh block grant
3)      'Devolution on demand' for regions of England
4)      Oppose Scottish independence
Brexit


Conservatives:
1)      Leave the single market and customs union, while seeking a “deep and special partnership” with the EU
2)      Secure a "smooth and orderly Brexit" while maintaining that "no deal is better than a bad deal for the UK"
3)      Determine a "fair settlement of the UK’s rights and obligations" in our withdrawal from the EU
4)      Pass a Great Repeal Bill to convert EU law into UK law
Labour:
1)      Scrap the Brexit white paper and replace it with a fresh set of negotiating priorities with an "emphasis on the single market and customs union"
2)      Immediately guarantee rights of EU citizens living in Britain
3)      Replace the "Great Repeal Bill" with an EU rights and protections bill that will ensure no change to workers' rights or environmental protections
4)      Reject "no deal" with the European Union as a viable option                           
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Hold a referendum on the final Brexit deal, with the option to remain in the EU
2)      Unilaterally guarantee the rights of EU nationals in the UK
3)      Stay in the single market and customs union
4)      Support the principle of freedom of movement between the UK and EU - the right to work, travel, study and retire abroad
Transport and environment


Conservatives:
1)      Investing £40bn across the rest of this decade on transport improvements
2)      Work with train companies and employees to agree to minimum service levels during industrial disputes
3)      Expand Heathrow airport
4)      Remove the "complexity and perverse pricing" of rail tickets
Labour:
1)      Renationalise Britain’s railways as franchises expire
2)      Let local councils take over bus services if they wish to
3)      New clean air act to legislate against diesel fumes
4)      Ban fracking
Liberal Democrats:
1)      Introduce a diesel scrappage scheme
2)      Extend ultra-low emission zones to 10 more towns and cities
3)      Set legally binding target of zero net greenhouse gas emissions by 2050
4)      Oppose fracking






Featured Post

HOW DID THE UK COME TO HAVE A REFERENDUM FOR BREXIT ?

Notwithstanding the fact that it was the Conservative Party that signed away the keys to Britain's  sovereignty when John Major signed ...